4.8 Article

Spatial Search by Quantum Walk is Optimal for Almost all Graphs

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 116, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.100501

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (Portugal) [PEst-OE/EGE/UI0491/2013, PEst-OE/EEI/LA0008/2013, UID/EEA/50008/2013]
  2. EU FEDER
  3. EU [GA 318287, GA 323901, 600700, 323970]
  4. DP-PMI
  5. FCT (Portugal) [SFRH/BD/52246/2013, SFRH/BD/52241/2013]
  6. ERC Advanced Grant MQC [320731]
  7. Latvian State Research Programme NexIT Project [1]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PEst-OE/EGE/UI0491/2013] Funding Source: FCT
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [320731] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of finding a marked node in a graph can be solved by the spatial search algorithm based on continuous-time quantum walks (CTQW). However, this algorithm is known to run in optimal time only for a handful of graphs. In this work, we prove that for Erdos-Renyi random graphs, i.e., graphs of n vertices where each edge exists with probability p, search by CTQW is almost surely optimal as long as p >= log(3/2) (n) / n. Consequently, we show that quantum spatial search is in fact optimal for almost all graphs, meaning that the fraction of graphs of n vertices for which this optimality holds tends to one in the asymptotic limit. We obtain this result by proving that search is optimal on graphs where the ratio between the second largest and the largest eigenvalue is bounded by a constant smaller than 1. Finally, we show that we can extend our results on search to establish high fidelity quantum communication between two arbitrary nodes of a random network of interacting qubits, namely, to perform quantum state transfer, as well as entanglement generation. Our work shows that quantum information tasks typically designed for structured systems retain performance in very disordered structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available