4.6 Article

Methanol diffusion in zeolite HY: a combined quasielastic neutron scattering and molecular dynamics simulation study

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 18, Issue 26, Pages 17294-17302

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp01151a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/G036675/1]
  2. STFC
  3. ISIS Neutron and Muon source
  4. UK Catalysis Hub
  5. EPSRC [EP/K014706/1, EP/K014668/1, EP/K014854/1EP/K014714/1, EP/M013219/1]
  6. EPSRC [EP/K014668/1, EP/K014714/1, EP/M013219/1, EP/I019693/1, EP/K014706/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1065602, EP/M013219/1, EP/K014668/1, EP/K014714/1, EP/K014706/1, EP/I019693/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diffusion of methanol in zeolite HY is studied using tandem quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS) experiments and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at 300-400 K. The experimental diffusion coefficients were measured in the range 2-5 x 10(-10) m(2) s(-1) and simulated diffusion coefficients calculated in the range of 1.6-3.2 x 10(-9) m(2) s(-1). Activation energies were measured as 8.8 and 6.9 kJ mol(-1) using QENS and MD respectively. Differences may be attributed predominantly to the experimental use of a dealuminated HY sample, containing significant defects such as strongly adsorbing silanol nests, compared to a perfect simulated crystal containing only evenly distributed Bronsted acid sites. Experimental and simulated diffusivities measured in this study are lower than those obtained from those previously calculated in siliceous faujasite, due to methanol H-bonding to Bronsted acid sites as observed in the MD simulations. However, both experimental and simulated diffusivities were significantly higher than those obtained in NaX, due to the higher concentration of extraframe work cations present in the previously studied structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available