4.6 Article

Hierarchical spatial heterogeneity in liquid crystals composed of graphene oxides

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 18, Issue 32, Pages 22399-22406

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp03614g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JST SENTANKEISOKU [13A0004]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [15H05496, 25102535, 15H02183]
  3. National Creative Research Initiative Center Project for Mult-Dimensional Directed Nanoscale Assembly of the National Research Foundation of Korea (MSIP) [2015R1A3A2033061]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25248021, 15K13789, 15J04575, 15H02183, 15H05496] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene oxide (GO) is a class of two-dimensional materials with a thickness of about 1 nm and a broad distribution of lateral dimension commonly approaching several micrometers. A dispersion of GOs in water often forms a liquid crystal, which is expected to be a promising precursor for the fabrication of carbon-based materials with well-ordered structures. To accelerate the application of GO-based liquid crystals, their structures and physical properties at various sizes must be well understood. To that end, we examined the local rheological properties of GO-based liquid crystals in the nematic phase using a particle tracking technique, where local properties can be accessed by observing the thermal motion of embedded probe particles. Particle diffusion was spatially heterogeneous, and depended on the size of the particles. Such a size-dependent heterogeneity can be associated with a hierarchical local environment, which is time-dependent for this system. The anisotropic particle diffusion originated from particles trapped in between the GO layers and in isotropic-like regions. The aggregation states of the GO dispersion composed of nematic and isotropic-like regions were observed using confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available