4.7 Article

Immobilization of Cd in a paddy soil using moisture management and amendment

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 131-136

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.026

Keywords

Continuous flooding; Conventional irrigation; Wetting irrigation; Paddy soil; Immobilization; Rice plant (Oryza saliva)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21177068]
  2. Program for Distinguished Scholar and Innovative Team of MOA [2012-jcrc-xym]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To offer basis for remediation of Cd-polluted paddy soil under reasonable water condition, pot experiment was conducted to study the effects of moisture management and amendment on the immobilization of Cd in paddy soil. Application of sepiolite in combination with phosphate fertilizer reduced exchangeable Cd by 18.2%, 13.7% and 12.5%, brown rice Cd by 52.3%, 46.0% and 46.8%, under continuous flooding, conventional irrigation and wetting irrigation, respectively, compared to the control groups. Under no amendments, the content of Fe(II) in root coating in the continuous flooding treatment was 2.3 and 3.6 times of that in the conventional and wetting irrigation treatments, but Cd content in root coating in the continuous flooding treatment was only 82.6% and 73.8% of that in the conventional and wetting irrigation treatments. Amendments application increased Fe(II) in root coating by 40.1%, 70.2% and 78.0%, but reduced the Cd content in root coating by 35.3%, 42.4% and 38.6% under continuous flooding, conventional irrigation and wetting irrigation, respectively. The lower availability of Cd in soil and the competition for adsorption sites in root coating of rice plant between Cd2+ and Fe2+ etc. reduced form bivalent ions in paddy soil resulted in lower Cd concentrations in brown rice in amended soil treatments. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available