4.7 Article

Multi-residue analysis of pharmaceuticals in wastewater by liquid chromatography-magnetic sector mass spectrometry: Method quality assessment and application in a Belgian case study

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages S2-S8

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.069

Keywords

Emerging pollutant; Pharmaceutical; Wastewater treatment plant; High-resolution mass spectrometry; Validation; Environmental risk assessment

Funding

  1. Special Research Fund of Ghent University
  2. Flemish Government [BOF 11/STA/027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through systematic research a novel analytical method using solid-phase extraction (SPE) and liquid chromatography magnetic sector mass spectrometry was developed for the measurement of 43 pharmaceuticals in wastewater. A thorough method validation quantified the contribution of both the extraction recovery and matrix effects in the overall method process efficiency, and a detailed uncertainty analysis was performed to elaborate a quality labelling strategy to be used in data interpretation. Compounds for which a precise (relative standard deviation <20%) process efficiency between 60% and 140% was determined, were labelled as 'quantitative' whereas the results for other compounds should be interpreted as 'indicative'. Method application on influent and effluent samples of (i) a conventional active sludge system and (ii) a parallel membrane bioreactor/conventional active sludge wastewater treatment plant in Belgium revealed the occurrence of 22 pharmaceuticals. The anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac and the antidepressant venlafaxine were measured in the effluents at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 1.8 mu g L-1 and 0.2 to 0.5 mu g L-1, respectively, which indicated to be of high potential environmental risk for the receiving river Dender, Belgium. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available