4.6 Article

Electronic and transport properties of PSi@MoS2 nanocables

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 4333-4344

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp05694b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [51473042]
  2. SF for leaders in academe of Harbin City of China [2013RFXXJ024]
  3. SF for youth reserve talent of Harbin of China [2014RFQXJ075]
  4. NSF of Heilongjiang Province of China [E201236, LC2015005]
  5. foundation for the department of education of Heilongjiang Province of China [12521074]
  6. National Ministry of Education for returned overseas [[2014]1685]
  7. SF for backup leader of leading talent echelon in Heilongjiang Province of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electronic structures and transport properties of prototype MoS2 nanotube (15, 0) nanocables, including undoped PSi@MoS2 and B-and P-doped PSi@MoS2 (where PSi refers to polysilane), are investigated using the density functional theory (DFT) and the non-equilibrium Green's function (NEGF) methods. It is found that transport properties of two-probe systems by sandwiching finite long nanocables between two Au electrodes are basically in agreement with the electronic structures of their corresponding infinitely long systems. Encapsulating undoped and doped PSi nanowires inside the MoS2 nanotubes could not significantly affect the electronic and transport properties. B-doping and P-doping upon PSi play different roles in the electronic and transport properties. B-doping may exert constructive and destructive effects on electron transport depending on its position and applied bias direction, while P-doping displays a negligible effect. In addition, we found that bi-doping by two adjacent B atoms could slightly enhance the conductivity. These results could offer some clues for conducting experiments to achieve nanoelectronic devices with intrinsic transport properties of MoS2 nanotubes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available