4.7 Article

Evaluating the mutagenicity of leachates obtained from the bottom ash of a municipal solid waste incinerator by using a Salmonella reverse mutation assay

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 70-76

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.013

Keywords

Bottom ash; Mutagenicity; Biotoxicity; Ames test; TCLP

Funding

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China (Taiwan) [NSC 101-2221-E-131-028-MY3, NSC 102-2320-B-562-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mutagenic potential of leachates derived from the bottom ash of a municipal solid waste incinerator in Taiwan were evaluated using an Ames Salmonella mutagenicity assay with three standard tester strains, TA98, TA100, and TA1535. Three types of leachants, leachant A (pH 4.93), leachant B (pH 2.88), and leachant C (deionized water, pH 6.0), were carried out according to toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). Moreover, two types of bottom ash, nonsieved and sieved bottom ash (particle size <4.75 mm), were analyzed with the TCLP and the Ames assay. The concentrations of five heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn) in the leachates were also estimated with an ICP-OES. The results indicated that the metal concentrations in the TCLP leachates of bottom ash were all below the limits set by Taiwanese regulations. However, leachate A from nonsieved and <4.75-mm-sieved bottom ash showed mutagenicity. Moreover, leachate A from <4.75 mm-sieved bottom ash displayed stronger mutagenicity than that from nonsieved ash. The leachate A from <4.75-mm-sieved bottom ash, that were diluted by 100-fold showed no mutagenicity. In conclusion, our results suggested that the chemical composition and mutagenic potential of leachates should be monitored to evaluate the safety of bottom ash. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available