4.7 Article

Chlorinated, brominated and fluorinated organic pollutants in African Penguin eggs: 30 years since the previous assessment

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.071

Keywords

Spheniscus demersus; Eggshell thickness; Indian Ocean; Atlantic Ocean; Persistent organic pollutants; POPs

Funding

  1. South African Norwegian Programme for Research Cooperation
  2. University Research Committee of the University of Cape Town, Earthwatch Institute
  3. NRF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The African Penguin population has drastically declined over the last 100 years. Changes in food availability due to over-fishing and other oceanographic changes seem to be major causes. However, it has also been 30 years since organic pollutants as a potential factor have been assessed. We analysed penguin eggs collected in 2011 and 2012 from two breeding colonies 640 km apart: Robben Island near Cape Town on the Atlantic Ocean coast, and Bird Island near Port Elizabeth on the Indian Ocean coast of South Africa. We quantified organochlorine pesticides, brominated flame retardants, and perfluorinated compounds (PFCs). Compared to 30 years ago, concentrations of Sigma DDT have remained about the same or slightly lower, while Sigma PCBs declined almost four-fold. The use of DDT in malaria control is unlikely to have contributed. PFCs were detected in all eggs. Indications (non-significant) of eggshell thinning associated with Sigma DDT and Sigma PCB was found. It seems therefore that the concentrations of measured organic pollutants the African Penguin eggs are not contributing directly to its current demise, but concerns remain about thinner shells and desiccation. Effects of combinations of compounds and newer compounds cannot be excluded, as well as more subtle effects on reproduction, development, and behaviour. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available