4.2 Article

Molecular and morphological delineation of Caloglossa beccarii and related species (Delesseriaceae, Rhodophyta)

Journal

PHYCOLOGIA
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 640-649

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.2216/16-19.1

Keywords

Brackish water; Caloglossa fluviatilis; Caloglossa stipitata; Culture experiment; Digeneaside; Freshwater; LSU rDNA; Mangrove algae; Mannitol; Morphology; rbcL

Funding

  1. JSPS Kakenhi [15K07194]
  2. Australian Research Council
  3. Australian Biological Resources Study
  4. Hermon Slade Foundation
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  6. Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K07194] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systematic studies on the closely related red algal species of Caloglossa, C. beccarii, C. fluviatilis and C. stipitata, were conducted because the morphological and phylogenetic distinction of the three species was not resolved previously. The large-subunit ribosomal DNA or rbcL gene analyses revealed that specimens from Indian freshwater rivers and German and Ukrainian freshwater aquaria form a clade with C. fluviatilis from the Panama Canal, and this clade is distinct from C. beccarii and C. stipitata. Caloglossa fluviatilis was morphologically distinguished from the other two species by the smaller number of cells in a second-order row at the internode, the narrower blade, smaller number of rhizoids at the node, and fewer rhizoids produced from wing cells. The number of rhizoids at the node and the ratio of internodal blade length to upper blade width were useful to delineate the three species. Low-molecular-weight carbohydrate analyses revealed that strains from freshwater habitats as well as brackish habitats contain both the C-6 polyol mannitol and the heteroside digeneaside. The present study confirmed the distinctness of the three species, and this is the first report of C. fluviatilis from other than the type locality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available