4.6 Review

The genetic and molecular architecture of phenotypic diversity in sticklebacks

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0486

Keywords

quantitative trait locus; Gasterosteus aculeatus; Pungitius pungitius; genetics of adaptation; repeated evolution

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS 1145866, DEB 1144556]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM116853]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [PDFMP3_134657]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PDFMP3_134657] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A major goal of evolutionary biology is to identify the genotypes and phenotypes that underlie adaptation to divergent environments. Stickleback fish, including the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and the ninespine stickleback (Pungitius pungitius), have been at the forefront of research to uncover the genetic and molecular architecture that underlies phenotypic diversity and adaptation. A wealth of quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping studies in sticklebacks have provided insight into longstanding questions about the distribution of effect sizes during adaptation as well as the role of genetic linkage in facilitating adaptation. These QTL mapping studies have also provided a basis for the identification of the genes that underlie phenotypic diversity. These data have revealed that mutations in regulatory elements play an important role in the evolution of phenotypic diversity in sticklebacks. Genetic and molecular studies in sticklebacks have also led to new insights on the genetic basis of repeated evolution and suggest that the same loci are involved about half of the time when the same phenotypes evolve independently. When the same locus is involved, selection on standing variation and repeated mutation of the same genes have both contributed to the evolution of similar phenotypes in independent populations. This article is part of the themed issue 'Evo-devo in the genomics era, and the origins of morphological diversity'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available