4.4 Article

Deformation mechanisms of ultra-thin Al layers in Al/SiC nanolaminates as a function of thickness and temperature

Journal

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE
Volume 96, Issue 32-34, Pages 3336-3355

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2016.1219075

Keywords

Multilayers; nanoindentation; thin-films; finite element modeling

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [NSF-DMR-1209988]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [PCIN-2013-029, MAT2012-31889]
  3. US DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC)
  5. Spanish Ministry of Education
  6. Fulbright program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanical properties of Al/SiC nanolaminates with layer thicknesses between 10 and 100 nm were studied by nanoindentation in the temperature range 25 to 100 degrees C. The strength of the Al layers as a function of the layer thickness and temperature was obtained from the hardness of the nanolaminates by an inverse methodology based on the numerical simulation of the nanoindentation tests by means of the finite element method. The room temperature yield stress of the Al layers showed a large 'the thinner, the stronger' effect, which depended not only on the layer thickness but also on the microstructure, which changed with the Al layer thickness. The yield stress of the Al layers at ambient temperature was compatible with a deformation mechanism controlled by the interaction of dislocations with grain boundaries for the thicker layers (>50 nm), while confined layer slip appeared to be dominant for layers below 50 nm. There was a dramatic reduction in the Al yield stress with temperature, which increased as the Al layer thickness decreased, and led to an inverse size effect at 100 degrees C. This behavior was compatible with plastic deformation mechanisms controlled by grain boundary and interface diffusion at 100 degrees C, which limit the strength of the ultra-thin Al layers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available