4.7 Review

Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes of Intrauterine Growth Restriction School-Age Children

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3868

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CONTEXT: Children who experienced intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) may be at increased risk for adverse neurologic developmental outcomes during the school-age years of life. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of IUGR on cognition and behavior in school-aged children. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched for English-language articles published after 1980. DATA SELECTION We included case-control studies reporting cognitive and/or behavioral data of children who had IUGR and were evaluated afterfifth birthday. DATA EXTRACTION: Cognitive data from 15 studies and behavioral data from 6 studies were selected with a total of 1559 cases and 1630 controls. The cognitive scores and behavioral outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: The controls had significantly higher cognitive scores than the children with IUGR (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.51 to -0.25, P < .00001). The IQ scores of the IUGR group were not significantly correlated with mean birth weight and gestational age (P > .05). Five trials were included in the behavioral outcomes trial, the behavior scores were significantly different between the groups with and without IUGR (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.48, P = .001). The incidence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was not significantly different between 2 groups (P = .11). LIMITATIONS: The number of studies that assessed behavioral and ADHD outcome is small. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate that IUGR is associated with lower cognitive scores in school-age children. However, further large-scale trials are needed to assess the effects of IUGR on the outcome of behavioral disorder and ADHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available