4.6 Article

Antenatal steroid exposure and heart rate variability in adolescents born with very low birth weight

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages 57-62

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2016.173

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [PO1HD0474584]
  2. General Clinical Research Center of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center [MO1 RR07122]
  3. Intramural Research Support Committee of Wake Forest Medical School
  4. Brenner Center for Child and Adolescent Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) suggests autonomic imbalance in the control of heart rate and is associated with unfavorable cardiometabolic outcomes. We examined whether antenatal corticosteroid (ANCS) exposure had long-term programming effects on HRV in adolescents born with very low birth weight (VLBW). METHODS: Follow-up study of a cohort of VLBW 14-y olds born between 1992 and 1996 with 50% exposed to ANCS. HRV in both the time and frequency domains using Nevrokard Software was determined from a 5-min electrocardiogram tracing. RESULTS: HRV data from 89 (35 male, 53 non-black) exposed (ANCS+) and 77 (28 male, 29 non-black) unexposed (ANCS-) adolescents were analyzed. HRV did not differ between ANCS+ and ANCS- black participants. However, in non-black participants, a significant interaction between ANCS and sex was observed, with ANCS- females having significantly greater HRV than ANCS+ females and males, and ANCS- males for both time and frequency domain variables. CONCLUSION: Among non-black adolescents born with VLBW, ANCS exposure is associated with reduced HRV with apparent sex-specificity. Reduced HRV has been associated with development of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes, thus supporting the need to monitor these outcomes in VLBW adolescents as they mature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available