4.6 Article

Pubertal height gain is inversely related to peak BMI in childhood

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages 448-454

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2016.253

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [7509, VR 2006-7777]
  2. Swedish Council Formas
  3. Swedish Research Council for Working Life and Social Research [2006-1624]
  4. Pfizer AB
  5. Governmental Grants for University Hospital Research (ALF) from RegionVastra Gotaland
  6. Southern Swedish healthcare region
  7. R&D department, County of Halland
  8. Foundation Vaxthuset for children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Childhood BMI may influence subsequent growth in height as well as the timing of puberty. The aim of the present study was to investigate associations between BMI in childhood and subsequent height gain/pubertal growth. METHODS: Longitudinal growth data were used (GrowUp(1990) Gothenburg cohort, n = 1,901). The QEPS growth-model was used to characterize height gain in relation to the highest BMISDS value between 3.5 and 8 y of age. Children were defined as over-weight/obese (OwOb) or normal weight/underweight (NwUw), using the 2012 International Obesity Task Force criteria. RESULTS: A negative association between childhood BMISDS and pubertal height gain was observed. Already at birth, OwOb children were heavier than NwUw children, and had a greater height velocity during childhood. Onset of puberty was 3.5/3.0 mo earlier in OwOb girls/boys, and they had 2.3/3.1 cm less pubertal height gain from the QEPS-models specific P-function than NwUw children. Adult height was not related to childhood BMI. CONCLUSION: We found that pubertal height gain was inversely related to peak BMI in childhood. Higher childhood BMISDS, was associated with more growth before onset of puberty, earlier puberty, and less pubertal height gain, resulting in similar adult heights for OwOb and NwUw children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available