4.4 Article

Detection of Airborne Respiratory Syncytial Virus in a Pediatric Acute Care Clinic

Journal

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 684-688

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.23630

Keywords

aerosol biology; infections: pneumonia; bronchiolitis; viral

Funding

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health [NHLBI RO1 HL-61007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of respiratory illness in infants and young children, but this virus is also capable of re-infecting adults throughout life. Universal precautions to prevent its transmission consist of gown and glove use, but masks and goggles are not routinely required because it is believed that RSV is unlikely to be transmitted by the airborne route. Our hypothesis was that RSV is present in respirable-size particles aerosolized by patients seen in a pediatric acute care setting. Study Design: RSV-laden particles were captured using stationary 2-stage bioaerosol cyclone samplers. Aerosol particles were separated into three size fractions (<1, 1-4.1, and >= 4.1 mu m) and were tested for the presence of RSV RNA by real-time PCR. Samplers were set 152cm (upper) and 102cm (lower) above the floor in each of two examination rooms. Results: Of the total, 554 samples collected over 48 days, only 13 (or 2.3%) were positive for RSV. More than 90% of the RSV-laden aerosol particleswere in the >= 4.1 mu m size range, which typically settle to the ground within minutes, whereas only one sample (or 8%) was positive for particles in the 1-4.1 mu m respirable size range. Conclusions: Our data indicate that airborne RSV-laden particles can be detected in pediatric outpatient clinics during the epidemic peak. However, RSV airborne transmission is highly inefficient. Thus, the logistical and financial implications of mandating the use of masks and goggles to prevent RSV spread seem unwarranted in this setting. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available