4.4 Article

Iohexol plasma clearance in children: validation of multiple formulas and two-point sampling times

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 311-320

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3436-z

Keywords

Glomerular filtration rate; Child; Chronic kidney disease; Renal function; Method

Funding

  1. Health Trust of Western Norway
  2. Norwegian Society of Nephrology
  3. Haukeland University Hospital
  4. Oslo University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In children, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) methods are hampered by inaccuracy, hence there is an obvious need for safe, simplified, and accurate measured GFR (mGFR) methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate different formulas and determine the optimal sampling points for calculating mGFR based on iohexol clearance measurements on blood samples drawn at two time points (GFR2p). The GFR of 96 children with different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (median age 9.2 years, range 3 months to 17.5 years) was determined using the iohexol plasma clearance, with blood sampling at seven time points within 5 h (GFR7p) as the reference method. Median GFR7p was 65.9 (range 6.3-153) mL/min/1.73 m(2). The performance of seven different formulas with early and late normalization to body surface area (BSA) was validated against the reference. The highest percentage (95.8 %) of GFR2p within 10 % of the reference was calculated using the formula of Jodal and Brochner-Mortensen (JBM) from 2009, with sampling at 2 and 5 h. Normalization to BSA before correction of the distribution phase improved the performance of the original Brochner-Mortensen method from 1972; P10 of 92.7 % compared to P10 of 82.3 % with late normalization, and a similar result was obtained with other formulas. GFR2p performed well across a wide spectrum of GFR levels with the JBM formula. Several other formulas tested performed well provided that early BSA normalization was performed. Blood sampling at 2 and 5 h is recommended for an optimal GFR2p assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available