4.1 Article

At the Mercy of the Gods: Associations Between Weather, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Children

Journal

PEDIATRIC EXERCISE SCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 152-163

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/pes.2015-0076

Keywords

pediatrics; physical activity; health

Funding

  1. Coca Cola Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: This study investigated associations between weather conditions, physical activity, and sedentary time in primary school-aged children in Australia and Canada. Methods: Cross-sectional data on 9-11-year-old children from the Australian (n = 491) and Canadian (n = 524) sites of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment were used. Minutes of daily moderate-to-vigorous-physical-activity (MVPA) and sedentary time were determined from 7-day, 24-h accelerometry (Actigraph GT3X+ triaxial accelerometer). Day-matched weather data (temperature, rainfall, snowfall, relative humidity, wind speed) were obtained from the closest weather station to participants' schools. Covariates included parental highest education level, day type, sex, and BMI z-scores. Generalized mixed model analyses allowing for clustering of participants within schools were completed. Scatterplots with Loess curves were created for maximum temperature, MVPA, and sedentary time. Results: Daily maximum temperature was significantly associated with MVPA and sedentary time in Australia (MVPA p = .05, sedentary p = .01) and Canada (p < .001, p = .001). Rainfall was negatively associated with MVPA in Australia (p < .001) and positively associated with sedentary time in Canada (p = .02). Conclusions: MVPA and sedentary time appear to be optimal when the maximum temperature ranges between 20 degrees C and 25 degrees C in both countries. The findings have implications for study design and interpretation for surveillance and intervention studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available