4.6 Article

Improving Multi-model Ensemble Probabilistic Prediction of Yangtze River Valley Summer Rainfall

Journal

ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 497-504

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-014-4073-8

Keywords

probability density function; seasonal prediction; multi-model ensemble; Yangtze River valley summer rainfall; Bayesian scheme

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [41005052, 41375086]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA05110201]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB950403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seasonal prediction of summer rainfall over the Yangtze River valley (YRV) is valuable for agricultural and industrial production and freshwater resource management in China, but remains a major challenge. Earlier multi-model ensemble (MME) prediction schemes for summer rainfall over China focus on single-value prediction, which cannot provide the necessary uncertainty information, while commonly-used ensemble schemes for probability density function (PDF) prediction are not adapted to YRV summer rainfall prediction. In the present study, an MME PDF prediction scheme is proposed based on the ENSEMBLES hindcasts. It is similar to the earlier Bayesian ensemble prediction scheme, but with optimization of ensemble members and a revision of the variance modeling of the likelihood function. The optimized ensemble members are regressed YRV summer rainfall with factors selected from model outputs of synchronous 500-hPa geopotential height as predictors. The revised variance modeling of the likelihood function is a simple linear regression with ensemble spread as the predictor. The cross-validation skill of 1960-2002 YRV summer rainfall prediction shows that the new scheme produces a skillful PDF prediction, and is much better-calibrated, sharper, and more accurate than the earlier Bayesian ensemble and raw ensemble.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available