4.3 Article

The Internalization, Distribution, and Ultrastructure Damage of Silica Nanoparticles in Human Hepatic L-02 Cells

Journal

PARTICLE & PARTICLE SYSTEMS CHARACTERIZATION
Volume 33, Issue 9, Pages 664-674

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201600043

Keywords

cellular distribution; internalization; silica nanoparticles; size; ultrastructure damage

Funding

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation Program and Scientific Research Key Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [KZ201410025022]
  2. Training Programme Foundation for the Talents by the Beijing Ministry of Education [2014000020124G157]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81402716]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Capital Medical University [2015ZR13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, due to the wide use of amorphous silica nanoparticles (SiNPs), their adverse effects on human beings are attracting more attention. Understanding the interaction between SiNPs and cells is a fundamental step for toxicity assessment. Therefore, the current study is aimed at elaborating the internalization process, subcellular distribution, ultrastructure damage, and cytotoxicity of two different sizes of SiNPs (Nano-Si64 and Nano-Si46) in L-02 cells. The results indicate that the smaller-sized SiNPs, Nano-Si46, accumulate in cells more efficiently and produce a stronger cytotoxic effect than Nano-Si64. Both types of nanoparticles can accumulate in L-02 cells through the active endocytotic pathway and passive diffusion, and distribute within endocytotic vesicles or freely in cytoplasma and organelles. Microvillus fracture, membrane injury, mitochondria damage, degranulation of the rough endoplasmic reticulum, lamellar-like structure, lysosome destruction, autophagosomes, and autophagy-lysosomes are found in L-02 cells. Oxidative damage and direct interaction between SiNPs and subcellular structure are responsible for the toxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available