4.5 Review

Pharmacological treatment in Parkinson's disease: Effects on gait

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages 3-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.07.006

Keywords

Gait; Dopamine; Acetylcholine; Turning; Falls

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG006457-29, 2P50 NS062684]
  2. VA Merit award [I01 RX001075-01]
  3. Medical Research Foundation of Oregon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gait impairments are a hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD), both as early symptom and an important cause of disability later in the disease course. Although levodopa has been shown to improve gait speed and step length, the effect of dopamine replacement therapy on other aspects of gait is less well understood. In fact, falls are not reduced and some aspects of postural instability during gait are unresponsive to dopaminergic treatment. Moreover, many medications other than dopaminergic agents, can benefit or impair gait in people with PD. We review the effects of pharmacological interventions used in PD on gait, discriminating, whenever possible, among effects on four components of everyday mobility: straight walking, gait initiation, turning, gait adaptability. Additionally, we summarize the effects on freezing of gait. There is substantial evidence for improvement of spatial characteristics of simple, straight-ahead gait with levodopa and levodopa-enhancing drugs. Recent work suggests that drugs aiming to enhance the acetylcholine system might improve gait stability measures. There is a lack of well-designed studies to evaluate effects on more complex, but highly relevant walking abilities such as turning and making flexible adjustments to gait. Finally, paucity in the literature exists on detrimental effects of drugs used in PD that are known to worsen gait and postural stability in the elderly population. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available