4.5 Article

Motor and non-motor outcomes of continuous apomorphine infusion in 125 Parkinson's disease patients

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 17-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.11.013

Keywords

Apomorphine; Parkinson's disease; Motor fluctuations; Dyskinesia; Visual hallucinations

Funding

  1. Mosafarma [662616]
  2. Britannia
  3. AbbVie en Medtronic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Continuous apomorphine infusion (CAI) is an effective treatment in fluctuating Parkinson's disease (PD). However, long-term efficacy and safety data of CAI are scarce. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed long-term outcomes of CAI on motor and non-motor symptoms in a Dutch cohort of 125 PD patients. Results: Our cohort (age: 65.8 +/- 9.8 years, disease duration: 11.9 +/- 5.7 years) had a mean daily dose of apomorphine of 66 +/- 30 mg, thereby reducing the levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD) by 20%. The mean duration of treatment with apomorphine was 32.3 +/- 31.9 months, ranging up to 139 months. Three-quarters of patients discontinued within the first four years. The main reason for discontinuation was a decreasing therapeutic effect. Patients who stopped apomorphine within four years had a lower LEDD reduction at hospital discharge and at last follow-up compared to patients who continued for a longer period. CAI showed good effects on motor fluctuations and dyskinesia, with better outcomes in patients with more pronounced LEDD reduction. CAI could be safely applied in patients with pre-existing visual hallucinations (30%). Conclusion: CAI showed beneficial effects on motor and several non-motor symptoms, whereas the magnitude of LEDD reduction seems to be a positive predictive factor on the duration of CAI. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available