4.4 Article

Diversifying forest communities may change Lyme disease risk: extra dimension to the dilution effect in Europe

Journal

PARASITOLOGY
Volume 143, Issue 10, Pages 1310-1319

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182016000688

Keywords

Biodiversity; Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies; dilution effect; disease ecology; forest diversification; public health; Ixodes ricinus; Lyme disease.

Categories

Funding

  1. IWT-Flanders
  2. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lyme disease is caused by bacteria of the Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies complex and transmitted by Ixodid ticks. In North America only one pathogenic genospecies occurs, in Europe there are several. According to the dilution effect hypothesis (DEH), formulated in North America, nymphal infection prevalence (NIP) decreases with increasing host diversity since host species differ in transmission potential. We analysed Borrelia infection in nymphs from 94 forest stands in Belgium, which are part of a diversification gradient with a supposedly related increasing host diversity: from pine stands without to oak stands with a shrub layer. We expected changing tree species and forest structure to increase host diversity and decrease NIP. In contrast with the DEH, NIP did not differ between different forest types. Genospecies diversity however, and presumably also host diversity, was higher in oak than in pine stands. Infected nymphs tended to harbour Borrelia afzelii infection more often in pine stands while Borrelia garinii and Borrelia burgdorferi ss. infection appeared to be more prevalent in oak stands. This has important health consequences, since the latter two cause more severe disease manifestations. We show that the DEH must be nuanced for Europe and should consider the response of multiple pathogenic genospecies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available