4.3 Article

Oxaliplatin-Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis of 2 Phase II Trials

Journal

PANCREAS
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages 1394-1400

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000659

Keywords

neuroendocrine tumors; carcinoid tumors; islet cell tumors

Funding

  1. Genentech
  2. Sanofi-Aventis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This study aimed to determine the safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab (B) plus FOLFOX or CAPOX in advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) by performing a combined analysis of 2 separate prospective phase II studies. Methods In the FOLFOX/B study, patients received chemotherapy without scheduled breaks in 3 cohorts: carcinoid, pancreatic NET, and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. In the CAPOX/B study, NET subtypes were pooled, and patients were treated with 4 cycles of CAPOX/B followed by optional maintenance therapy. Primary end points were radiographic response rate (RR) after 12 cycles (FOLFOX/B), progression-free survival (PFS) (CAPOX/B), and toxicity (both). Results Seventy-six patients (FOLFOX/B, n = 36; CAPOX/B, n = 40) were included. In FOLFOX/B, RR for carcinoid at 12 cycles 3/22 (13.6%), median PFS 19.3 months; RR for pancreatic NET at 12 cycles 4/12 (41.7%), median PFS 21 months; RR 1/2 (50%) in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; pooled RR 25% and median PFS 21 months (1-year PFS 68%). In CAPOX/B (pooled NET), RR 18% and median PFS 16.7 months (1-year PFS 65%). Predictable toxicity was observed. Conclusions Neither study met its primary end point, but radiographic responses and prolonged disease stability in previously progressing patients suggest that selected patients with NET may benefit from oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy plus bevacizumab and that the combination may warrant further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available