4.7 Article

Not only hyenids: A multi-scale analysis of Upper Pleistocene carnivore coprolites in Cova del Coll Verdaguer (NE Iberian Peninsula)

Journal

PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY
Volume 443, Issue -, Pages 249-262

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.11.047

Keywords

Cova del Coll Verdaguer; Coprolite; Upper Pleistocene; Micromorphology; Carnivore; Hyenid

Funding

  1. Grup de Recerca del Quaternari [2014/100639]
  2. portuguese Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia from the FSE/POPH [SFRH/BPD/100828/2014, SFRH/BPD/100507/2014]
  3. Laboratoire d'Excellence LabexMed (Aix-Marseille Universite, CNRS) [UMR7269]
  4. Graduate School Human Development in Landscapes (Kiel University) in the frame of the German Universities Excellence Initiative
  5. [2014SGR-108]
  6. [HAR2014-55131]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/100507/2014] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three morphotypes of fossil fecal material (coprolites) have been identified from the Upper Pleistocene site of Cova del Coll Verdaguer (NE Iberian Peninsula). Coprolites are commonly found in Pleistocene records and also in places in which human and carnivore activities co-occurred. However, coprolite identification is typically limited to hyenids, the most readily recognizable fossilized feces, owing to their distinctive shape and good preservation, although non-hyena carnivore coprolites are also likely to be present in these assemblages. Several criteria for a multi-scale integrative analysis are proposed here for discriminating different morphotypes. Hence, this analysis provides an opportunity to assess the involvement of several carnivores in bone accumulations, to identify carnivores not specifically represented by skeletal remains and to evaluate interactions between humans and the carnivore guild, especially medium and small carnivores. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available