4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Significance of Tumor Stage in Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma Survival: A Population-Based Analysis

Journal

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
Volume 154, Issue 4, Pages 667-673

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0194599816629649

Keywords

sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma; epidemiology; outcomes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To describe the incidence and determinants of survival of patients with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) from 1973 to 2011 using the SEER database (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results), with consideration of tumor stage based on the Kadish system. Study Design Retrospective database analysis. Setting Academic medical center. Subjects and Methods The SEER registry was utilized to calculate survival trends for 328 patients with SNUC between 1973 and 2011. Patient data were then analyzed with respect to histopathology, age, sex, race, subsite, modified Kadish stage, tumor size, and treatments rendered. Results The cohort was composed of 61.9% males with median age of 60 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 1.9 years. Most tumors presented in the nasal cavity, maxillary sinus, and ethmoid sinus (29.3%, 27.4%, 21%, respectively); 43.7% of patients received both surgical and radiation therapy. OS at 2, 5, and 10 years was 43%, 30%, and 25%, respectively. On univariate analysis, age, Kadish stage, and tumor size were associated with worse OS and disease-specific survival (DSS), while surgery and radiation therapy were associated with improved OS and DSS (all P < .05). On multivariate analysis, radiation therapy and lower Kadish stage were associated with improved OS and DSS, while younger age was additionally associated with improved OS (all P < .05). Conclusion SNUC is a rare but aggressive sinonasal malignancy. Tumor stage as determined by the Kadish system is associated with worse survival, with radiation therapy appearing to play a key role in therapeutic management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available