4.5 Review

Birdshot chorioretinopathy: current knowledge and new concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment

Journal

ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0429-8

Keywords

Birdshot chorioretinopathy; HLA-A29; Immunomodulatory therapy; Multimodality diagnostic imaging; T-helper 17

Funding

  1. Birdshot Uveitis Society/Fight for Sight [24BU151]
  2. MRC [G0600416] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Fight for Sight [1994, UOVU12, 24NE142] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G0600416] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2010-18-004, CL-2015-09-003, CL-2009-09-002, CS-2014-14-023] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Birdshot chorioretinopathy (BCR) is a rare form of chronic, bilateral, posterior uveitis with a distinctive clinical phenotype, and a strong association with HLA-A29. It predominantly affects people in middle age. Given its rarity, patients often encounter delays in diagnosis leading to delays in adequate treatment, and thus risking significant visual loss. Recent advances have helped increase our understanding of the underlying autoimmune mechanisms involved in disease pathogenesis, and new diagnostic approaches such as multimodality imaging have improved our ability to both diagnose and monitor disease activity. Whilst traditional immunosuppressants may be effective in BCR, increased understanding of immune pathways is enabling development of newer treatment modalities, offering the potential for targeted modulation of immune mediators. In this review, we will discuss current understanding of BCR and explore recent developments in diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of this disease. Synonyms for BCR: Birdshot chorioretinopathy, Birdshot retinochoroiditis, Birdshot retino-choroidopathy, Vitiliginous choroiditis. Orphanet number: ORPHA179 OMIM: 605808.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available