4.5 Article

Pears characteristics (soluble solids content and firmness prediction, varieties) testing methods based on visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging

Journal

OPTIK
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages 2624-2630

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.11.193

Keywords

Pear; Hyperspectral image; Soluble solids content; Firmness; Varieties

Categories

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA030602]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61378060]
  3. National Science Instrument Important Project [2011YQ14014704]
  4. Dawn Program of Shanghai Education Commission [11SG44]
  5. Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation [13ZR1427800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Visible-near infrared hyperspectral images (400-1000 nm) were used for non-destructive variety discrimination and prediction of soluble solids content (SSC) and firmness of pears. An imaging spectroscopy system was assembled to acquire scattering images from pears. Spectra of 180 pear samples from three varieties were analyzed by four algorithms of principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares (PLS), successive projections algorithm (SPA) and Fisher linear discriminant analysis (Fisher LDA) to detect SSC, firmness and varieties of pears. Then PLS models under whole spectral wavelengths were compared with SPA-PLS models under effective wavelengths. The SPA-PLS models were considered to be the best method for detecting firmness and SSC of pears. The model led to correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9977 for firmness and 0.9924 for SSC and root mean square error (RMSEP) estimated by cross-validation of 0.062653 for firmness and 0.03175 for SSC. The correct answer rate of 95.56% for variety discrimination was achieved by Fisher LDA. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available