4.8 Article

Role of Na+ Interstitials and Dopants in Enhancing the Na+ Conductivity of the Cubic Na3PS4 Superionic Conductor

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 27, Issue 24, Pages 8318-8325

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03656

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation's Designing Materials to Revolutionize and Engineer our Future (DMREF) program [1436976]
  2. National Science Foundation [ACI-1053575]
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1436976] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we performed a first-principles investigation of the phase stability, dopant formation energy and Na4+ conductivity of pristine and doped cubic Na3PS4 (c-Na3PS4). We show that pristine c-Na3PS4 is an extremely poor Na ionic conductor, and the introduction of Na4+ excess is the key to achieving reasonable Na+ conductivities. We studied the effect of aliovalent doping of M4+ for P5+ in c-Na3PS4, yielding Na3+xMxP1-xS4 (M = Si, Ge, and Sn with x = 0.0625; M = Si with x = 0.125). The formation energies in all the doped structures with dopant concentration of x = 0.0625 are found to be relatively low. Using ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, we predict that 6.25% Si-doped c-Na3PS4 has a Na+ conductivity of 1.66 mS/cm, in excellent agreement with previous experimental results. Remarkably, we find that Sn4+ doping at the same concentration yields a much higher predicted Na+ conductivity of 10.7 mS/cm, though with a higher dopant formation energy. A higher Si4+ doping concentration of x = 0.125 also yields a significant increase in Na+ conductivity with an even higher dopant formation energy. Finally, topological and van Hove correlation function analyses suggest that the channel volume and correlation in Na+ motions may play important roles in enhancing Na+ conductivity in this structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available