4.8 Article

Oxygen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalysis on Transition Metal Oxides and (Oxy)hydroxides: Activity Trends and Design Principles

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages 7549-7558

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03148

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1301461]
  2. China Scholar Council
  3. United States Air Force
  4. United States Air Force Academy faculty pipeline program
  5. Research Corporation for Science Advancement
  6. Sloan Foundation, and the Camille
  7. Henry Dreyfus Foundation
  8. Division Of Chemistry
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1301461] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poor oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysis limits the efficiency of H-2 production from water electrolysis and photoelectrolysis routes to large-scale energy storage. Despite nearly a century of research, the factors governing the activity of OER catalysts are not well understood. In this Perspective, we discuss recent advances in understanding the OER in alkaline media for earth-abundant, first-row, transition-metal oxides and (oxy)hydroxides. We argue that the most-relevant structures for study are thermodynamically stable (oxy)hydroxides and not crystalline oxides. We discuss thin-film electrochemical microbalance techniques to accurately quantify intrinsic activity and in situ conductivity measurements to identify materials limited by electronic transport. We highlight the dramatic effect that Fe cations added either intentionally or unintentionally from ubiquitous electrolyte impurities-have on the activity of common OER catalysts. We find new activity trends across the first-row transition metals, opposite of the established ones, and propose a new view of OER on mixed-metal (oxy)hydroxides that illustrates possible design principles and applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available