Journal
OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages 1080-1089Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.030
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Alcon
- Allergan
- Bayer Healthcare
- Pfizer
- Heidelberg Engineering
- Novartis
- Optos
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Carl Zeiss Meditec
- Alimera Sciences
- Bayer Schering
- Bausch Lomb
- Farmila Thea
- Genentech
- Hoffman La Roche
- Novagali Pharma
- Sanofi Aventis
- Thrombogenics
- Ophthotech
- Roche
- Thea
- Alcon Research, Ltd. (Fort Worth, TX)
- Advisory board member - Alcon
- Alimera
- Bayer
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of different doses of RTH258 applied as single intravitreal administration compared with ranibizumab 0.5 mg in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design: Six-month, phase 1/2, prospective, multicenter, double-masked, randomized, ascending singledose, active-controlled, parallel-group study. Participants: A total of 194 treatment-naive patients, aged >= 50 years, with primary subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD. Methods: Patients received a single intravitreal injection of RTH258 0.5 mg (n = 11), 3.0 mg (n = 31), 4.5 mg (n = 47), or 6.0 mg (n = 44), or ranibizumab 0.5 mg (n = 61). Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to month 1 in central subfield thickness (CSFT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The secondary efficacy end point was the duration of treatment effect measured as time from the initial injection to receipt of post-baseline therapy (PBT) guided by protocol-defined criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. Results: RTH258 demonstrated noninferiority compared with ranibizumab in mean change in CSFT from baseline to month 1 for the 4.5-and 6.0-mg dose groups (margin: 40 mm, 1-sided alpha 0.05). The difference in CSFT change at month 1 comparison with ranibizumab was 22.86 mm (90% confidence interval [CI], -9.28 to 54.99) and 19.40 mu m (95% CI, -9.00 to 47.80) for RTH258 4.5 and 6 mg, respectively. The median time to PBT after baseline therapy was 60 and 75 days for patients in the RTH258 4.5-and 6.0-mg groups, respectively, compared with 45 days for ranibizumab. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity with RTH258 were comparable to those observed with ranibizumab. The most frequent AEs reported for the RTH258 groups were conjunctival hemorrhage, eye pain, and conjunctival hyperemia; the majority of these events were mild in intensity. Conclusions: This first-in-human study of RTH258 demonstrated noninferiority in the change in CSFT at 1 month for the 4.5-and 6.0-mg doses compared with ranibizumab and an increase of 30 days in the median time to PBT for the 6.0-mg dose. There were no unexpected safety concerns, and the results support the continued development of RTH258 for the treatment of neovascular AMD. (C) 2016 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available