4.6 Article

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema 148-Week Results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 11, Pages 2376-2385

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.032

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Acucela
  2. Apellis
  3. Astellas
  4. Corcept
  5. Daiichi
  6. EyeGate
  7. Genentech
  8. Genzyme
  9. Kala Pharmaceuticals
  10. Neurotech
  11. Novartis
  12. Ophthotech
  13. Stealth BioTherapeutics
  14. Thrombogenics
  15. Alcon
  16. Alimera
  17. Allegro
  18. Allergan
  19. Ampio
  20. Clearside Biomedical
  21. Iconics
  22. National Eye Institute
  23. Roche
  24. Santen
  25. Xcovery
  26. Xoma
  27. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  28. Padova University Hospital
  29. Allergan Japan
  30. Hoya
  31. Kowa
  32. Nidek
  33. Otsuka
  34. Pfizer
  35. Senju
  36. Wakamoto
  37. GlaxoSmithKline
  38. LPath
  39. Ohr
  40. Bayer HealthCare
  41. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  42. Johnson Johnson
  43. Ohr Pharmaceutical
  44. Sanofi-Aventis
  45. Tyrogenex
  46. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  47. Carl Zeiss Meditec
  48. Heidelberg Engineering
  49. Optos

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME) over 3 years. Design: Two similarly designed phase 3 trials: VISTA(DME) and VIVIDDME. Participants: Patients (eyes; n = 872) with central-involved DME. Methods: Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or laser control. From week 24, if rescue treatment criteria were met, IAI patients received active laser, and laser control patients received IAI 2q8. From week 100, laser control patients who had not received IAI rescue treatment received IAI as needed per retreatment criteria. Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 52. We report the 148-week results. Results: Mean BCVA gain from baseline to week 148 with IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser control was 10.4, 10.5, and 1.4 letters (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 10.3, 11.7, and 1.6 letters (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. The proportion of eyes that gained >= 15 letters from baseline at week 148 was 42.9%, 35.8%, and 13.6% (P < 0.0001) in VISTA and 41.2%, 42.2%, and 18.9% (P < 0.0001) in VIVID, respectively. Greater proportions of eyes treated with IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 versus those treated with laser control had an improvement of >= 2 steps in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score in both VISTA (29.9% and 34.4% vs. 20.1% [P = 0.0350, IAI 2q4; P = 0.0052, IAI 2q8]) and VIVID (44.3% and 47.8% vs. 17.4% [P < 0.0001 for both]). In an integrated safety analysis, the most frequent ocular serious adverse event was cataract (3.1%, 2.1%, 0.3% for 2q4, 2q8, and control). Conclusions: Visual improvements observed with both IAI regimens (over laser control) at weeks 52 and 100 were maintained at week 148, with similar overall efficacy in the IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 groups. Treatment with IAI also had positive effects on the DRSS score. Over 148 weeks, the incidence of adverse events was consistent with the known safety profile of IAI. (C) 2016 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available