4.8 Article

The FEN1 L209P mutation interferes with long-patch base excision repair and induces cellular transformation

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 194-207

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.188

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB911600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271449]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation [BK20130044, BK20130061, BK2011783]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (RFDP) [20133207110005]
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China [NCET-13-0868]
  6. Priority Academic Program Development Award for Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  7. NIH [RO1 CA085344]
  8. NCI-designated cancer center [P30 CA033572]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flap endonuclease-1 (FEN1) is a multifunctional, structure-specific nuclease that has a critical role in maintaining human genome stability. FEN1 mutations have been detected in human cancer specimens and have been suggested to cause genomic instability and cancer predisposition. However, the exact relationship between FEN1 deficiency and cancer susceptibility remains unclear. In the current work, we report a novel colorectal cancer-associated FEN1 mutation, L209P. This mutant protein lacks the FEN, exonuclease (EXO) and gap endonuclease (GEN) activities of FEN1 but retains DNA-binding affinity. The L209P FEN1 variant interferes with the function of the wild-type FEN1 enzyme in a dominant-negative manner and impairs long-patch base excision repair in vitro and in vivo. Expression of L209P FEN1 sensitizes cells to DNA damage, resulting in endogenous genomic instability and cellular transformation, as well as tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model. These data indicate that human cancer associated genetic alterations in the FEN1 gene can contribute substantially to cancer development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available