4.7 Article

Detuning and wave breaking during nonlinear surface wave focusing

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages 215-223

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.048

Keywords

Nonlinearity; Detuning; Wave breaking; Breaking position; Spectra; Energy dissipation

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program [2011CB013701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51422901, 11172058, 51221961]
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China [201347]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using an energy focusing technique, several transient wave trains were generated in a two-dimensional wave flume to investigate their nonlinear evolution. By increasing the initial wave steepness (S-0), while all other parameters remained the same, non-breaking through breaking conditions were achieved. The experimental results demonstrated that the waves' initial steepness affected the focusing process significantly. As expected, the nonlinear effects on wave packets with a low initial steepness were very small. However, for cases with large initial steepness, nonlinearity increased causing the wave packet to focus and break prematurely, a detuning process. As a result of the detuning process more than one breaker may occur, and more importantly when this ensues, energy loss was altered. It is found that for S-0 < 0.274, only one breaker occurred, and the energy loss increased with increased initial steepness. For larger steepness, two breakers occurred and the total energy loss remained nearly constant (similar to 17%) as the initial steepness was increased. As the initial steepness was increased still further, a large plunging breaking was obtained with additional energy loss (4%). These results suggest that the detuning has a pronounced influence not only on the resulting wave field, but on the resulting energy loss. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available