4.7 Article

Moving mussels offshore? Perceptions of offshore aquaculture policy and expansion in New England

Journal

OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 1-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.05.004

Keywords

Offshore aquaculture; Stakeholder perceptions; Mussels; Ocean planning; New England

Funding

  1. Horowitz Foundation for Social Policy
  2. NOAA Fisheries Office of Aquaculture
  3. US National Science Foundation [1155299, 1155484]
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1155484] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1155299, 1359943, 1359805] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efforts to expand marine aquaculture into offshore environments have increased in the United States, however many questions remain about whether offshore aquaculture is a feasible and appropriate activity. This paper explores these questions by investigating stakeholder perceptions of offshore mussel aquaculture in New England, USA. These views provide insight into the important challenges and opportunities facing expansion, and elucidate whether and how industry may develop and be incorporated into ocean planning and management. Results shows that regulatory and financial conditions are considered the primary challenges facing offshore expansion, whereas technical, environmental, and market conditions were generally deemed favorable or manageable. There is greater uncertainty about social and political conditions. While moving mussel aquaculture offshore lessens the conflicts associated with inshore activity, it also moves industry into new spaces with unfamiliar users. There are tensions inherent in addressing these challenges. Whereas broad regulatory change will encourage offshore development, targeted government involvement may be more productive in the near term. Similarly, while large seafood companies may appear viable candidates for offshore development, they are also limited by regulatory, social, and political resistance. Overall, an increased emphasis on government interventions at the local and regional scale are desirable for proponents of offshore expansion. The paper discusses the management implications of these findings, and suggests that a shift in focus toward targeted and non-regulatory government interventions; local, regional, and informal planning discussions; and community-based and cooperative mussel aquaculture initiatives may hold promise for responsible development in New England offshore waters and elsewhere. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available