4.6 Review

Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: a systematic review, meta-analysis and realist synthesis

Journal

OBESITY REVIEWS
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 345-360

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/obr.12362

Keywords

Family; physical activity; interventions

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12015/7]
  2. Centre for Diet and Activity Research, a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence - British Heart Foundation
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Economic and Social Research Council
  5. Medical Research Council
  6. National Institute for Health Research
  7. Wellcome Trust [RES-590-28-0002]
  8. NIHR [NIHR-PDF-2012-05-157]
  9. ESRC [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MC_UU_12015/6, MC_UU_12015/7, MR/K023187/1, MC_UP_1001/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12015/6, MR/K023187/1, MC_UU_12015/7, MC_UP_1001/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. National Institute for Health Research [PDF-2012-05-157, CL-2007-18-012, 10/1008/07] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveFamily-based interventions represent a potentially valuable route to increasing child physical activity (PA) in children. A dual meta-analysis and realist synthesis approach examined existing interventions to assist those developing programmes to encourage uptake and maintenance of PA in children. DesignStudies were screened for inclusion based on including participants aged 5-12years, having a substantive aim of increasing PA by engaging the family and reporting on PA outcome. Duplicate data extraction and quality assessment were conducted. Meta-analysis was conducted in STATA. Realist synthesis included theory development and evidence mapping. ResultsForty-seven studies were included, of which three received a strong' quality rating, 21 moderate' and 23 weak'. The meta-analysis (19 studies) demonstrated a significant small effect in favour of the experimental group (standardized mean difference: 0.41; 95%CI 0.15-0.67). Sensitivity analysis, removing one outlier, reduced this to 0.29 (95%CI 0.14-0.45). Realist synthesis (28 studies) provided insight into intervention context (particularly, family constraints, ethnicity and parental motivation), and strategies to change PA (notably, goal-setting and reinforcement combined). ConclusionThis review provides key recommendations to inform policy makers and other practitioners in developing evidence-based interventions aimed at engaging the family to increase PA in children, and identifies avenues for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available