4.7 Article

A Randomized Pilot Study Comparing Zero-Calorie Alternate-Day Fasting to Daily Caloric Restriction in Adults with Obesity

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1874-1883

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21581

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R21 AT002617-02, UL1 TR001082, DK 048520]
  2. Colorado Obesity Research Institute (CORI)
  3. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alternate-day fasting (ADF) and to compare changes in weight, body composition, lipids, and insulin sensitivity index (Si) with those produced by a standard weight loss diet, moderate daily caloric restriction (CR). Methods: Adults with obesity (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2), age 18-55) were randomized to either zero-calorie ADF (n=14) or CR (2400 kcal/day, n=12) for 8 weeks. Outcomes were measured at the end of the 8-week intervention and after 24 weeks of unsupervised follow-up. Results: No adverse effects were attributed to ADF, and 93% completed the 8-week ADF protocol. At 8 weeks, ADF achieved a 376 kcal/day greater energy deficit; however, there were no significant betweengroup differences in change in weight (mean +/- SE; ADF -8.2 +/- 0.9 kg, CR -7.1 +/- 1.0 kg), body composition, lipids, or Si. After 24 weeks of unsupervised follow-up, there were no significant differences in weight regain; however, changes from baseline in % fat mass and lean mass were more favorable in ADF. Conclusions: ADF is a safe and tolerable approach to weight loss. ADF produced similar changes in weight, body composition, lipids, and Si at 8 weeks and did not appear to increase risk for weight regain 24 weeks after completing the intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available