4.7 Article

Inverse association between altitude and obesity: A prevalence study among andean and low-altitude adult individuals of Peru

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 929-937

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21401

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK29867, DK27619]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  3. Bonn-Bad Godesberg, Germany
  4. UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL1TR000124]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo determine the association between altitude and obesity in a nationally representative sample of the Peruvian adult population. MethodsThis is a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available data from the Food and Nutrition National Center (CENAN, Peru), period 2009-2010. The Prevalence ratio of obesity and abdominal obesity was determined as a measure of association. Obesity and abdominal obesity were diagnosed based on direct anthropometric measurements. ResultsThe final data set consisted of 31,549 individuals 20 years old. The prevalence ratio of obesity was as follows: 1.00 between 0 and 499 m (reference category), 1.00 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.16) between 500-1,499 m, 0.74 (0.63-0.86) between 1,500-2,999 m, and 0.54 (0.45-0.64) at 3,000 m, adjusting for age, sex, self-reported physical activity, out-migration rate, urbanization, poverty, education, and geographical latitude and longitude. In the same order, the adjusted prevalence ratio of abdominal obesity was 1.00, 1.01 (0.94-1.07), 0.93 (0.87-0.99), and 0.89 (0.82-0.95), respectively. We found an interaction between altitude and sex and between altitude and age (P<0.001, for both interactions) on the association with obesity and abdominal obesity. ConclusionsAmong Peruvian adult individuals, we found an inverse association between altitude and obesity, adjusting for multiple covariates. This adjusted association varied by sex and age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available