4.7 Article

INSIGHT Responsive Parenting Intervention is Associated with Healthier Patterns of Dietary Exposures in Infants

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 185-191

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21705

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01DK088244]
  2. Children's Miracle Network at Penn State Children's Hospital
  3. USDA [2011-67001-30117]
  4. Penn State Clinical & Translational Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University CTSA, NIH/NCATS Grant [UL1 TR000127]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether a responsive parenting (RP) intervention affects infant dietary patterns. Methods: Primiparous mother-newborn dyads (n = 291) were randomized to the Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) RP intervention or control. Curricula were delivered at nurse home visits at ages 3, 16, 28, and 40 weeks. RP group feeding guidance advised responsive feeding, delayed introduction of solids, repeated exposure to novel foods, and age-appropriate portion sizes. Latent class analysis identified patterns of dietary exposure at 9 months. Class membership at 9 months was used to predict BMI percentile at 2 years. Results: Five dietary patterns were identified: Breastfed, Fruits and Vegetables, Breastfed, Low Variety, Formula, Fruits and Vegetables, Formula, Low Variety, and Formula, High Energy Density. Over 60% of infants had patterns low in fruits and vegetables or high in energy-dense foods. RP group infants were less likely than control to be in the Formula, Low Variety class (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.71) or Formula, High Energy Density class (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.61) relative to the Formula, Fruits and Vegetables class. Dietary pattern at 9 months was significantly associated with BMI percentile at 2 years. Conclusions: While a majority of infants consumed diets low in fruits and vegetables, the INSIGHT RP intervention was associated with healthier dietary patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available