4.7 Article

Optimal Anthropometric Measures and Thresholds to Identify Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in Three Major Asian Ethnic Groups

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 2185-2193

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21609

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering PhD scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify optimal anthropometric measures and cutoffs to identify undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (UDM) in three major Asian ethnic groups (Chinese, Malays, and Asian-Indians). Methods: Cross-sectional data were analyzed from 14,815 ethnic Chinese, Malay, and Asian-Indian participants of the Singapore National Health Surveys, which included anthropometric measures and an oral glucose tolerance test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used with calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the performance of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHTR) for the identification of UDM. Results: BMI performed significantly worse (AUC(MEN)=0.70; AUC(WOMEN)=0.75) than abdominal measures, whereas WHTR (AUC(MEN)=0.76; AUC(WOMEN)=0.79) was among the best performing measures in both sexes and all ethnic groups. Anthropometric measures performed better in Chinese than in Asian-Indian participants for the identification of UDM. A WHTR cutoff of 0.52 appeared optimal with a sensitivity of 76% in men and 73% in women and a specificity of 63% in men and 70% in women. Conclusions: Although ethnic differences were observed in the performance of anthropometric measures for the identification of UDM, abdominal adiposity measures generally performed better than BMI, and WHTR performed best in all Asian ethnic groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available