4.8 Article

An efficient system for selectively altering genetic information within mRNAs

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw738

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R0111223855, 1R01NS64259, NIGMS 1P20GM103642, NIMHD 8G12-MD007600]
  2. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics [Rosent14XXO]
  3. National Science Foundation [DBI 0115825, DBI 1337284]
  4. Department of Defense [52680-RT-ISP]
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1337284] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Site-directed RNA editing (SDRE) is a strategy to precisely alter genetic information within mRNAs. By linking the catalytic domain of the RNA editing enzyme ADAR to an antisense guide RNA, specific adenosines can be converted to inosines, biological mimics for guanosine. Previously, we showed that a genetically encoded iteration of SDRE could target adenosines expressed in human cells, but not efficiently. Here we developed a reporter assay to quantify editing, and used it to improve our strategy. By enhancing the linkage between ADAR's catalytic domain and the guide RNA, and by introducing a mutation in the catalytic domain, the efficiency of converting a UAG premature termination codon (PTC) to tryptophan (UGG) was improved from similar to 11 % to similar to 70 %. Other PTCs were edited, but less efficiently. Numerous off-target edits were identified in the targeted mRNA, but not in randomly selected endogenous messages. Off-target edits could be eliminated by reducing the amount of guide RNA with a reduction in on-target editing. The catalytic rate of SDRE was compared with those for human ADARs on various substrates and found to be within an order ofmagnitude of most. These data underscore the promise of site-directed RNA editing as a therapeutic or experimental tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available