4.8 Article

Two p53 tetramers bind one consensus DNA response element

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 13, Pages 6185-6199

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw215

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [UK BBSRC BB/E019862/1]
  2. BBSRC
  3. UCL open publications fund
  4. BBSRC [BB/E019862/1, BB/E021042/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1104614, BB/E019862/1, BB/E021042/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

p53 tumor suppressor is a transcription factor that controls cell cycle and genetic integrity. In response to genotoxic stress p53 activates DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis or senescence, which are initiated via p53 binding to its specific DNA response elements (RE). The consensus p53 DNA RE consists of two decameric palindromic half-site sequences. Crystallographic studies have demonstrated that two isolated p53 DNA-binding core domains interact with one half-site of the p53 DNA REs suggesting that one p53 tetramer is bound to one RE. However, our recent 3D cryo-EM studies showed that the full-length p53 tetramer is bound to only one half-site of RE. Here, we have used biochemical and electron microscopy (EM) methods to analyze DNA-binding of human and murine p53 tetramers to various p53 DNA REs. Our new results demonstrate that two p53 tetramers can interact sequence-specifically with one DNA RE at the same time. In particular, the EM structural analysis revealed that two p53 tetramers bind one DNA RE simultaneously with DNA positioned between them. These results demonstrate a mode different from that assumed previously for the p53-DNA interaction and suggest important biological implications on p53 activity as a transcriptional regulator of cellular response to stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available