4.5 Review

Plant Volatilome in Greece: a Review on the Properties, Prospects, and Chemogeography

Journal

CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 1466-1480

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.201500171

Keywords

Volatile organic compounds; Natural resources maps; Geodatabase; Essential oils; Headspace sampling

Funding

  1. EU (European Social Fund)
  2. Greek national funds through Operational Program 'Education and Lifelong Learning' of National Strategic Reference Framework- Research Funding Program: Heraclitus II [2324-1/WP17/30340]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowing plant volatile chemodiversity and its distribution is essential in order to study biological processes, to estimate the plants' value in use, and to establish sustainable exploitation practices. Yet, attempts to collect and assess data on scent diversity and properties in well-defined geographical areas are rare. Here, we developed a geo-referenced database of the plant volatilome in Greece by consolidating the results included in 116 research articles published in the last 25 years. The data set compiled includes 999 volatile organic compounds distributed into 178 plant taxa, 59 genera, and 19 families. Distillation is the acquisition method almost exclusively used, whereas headspace techniques that would allow the study of subtle ecological processes are generally lacking. Sesquiterpenes show the greatest richness of compounds, followed by monoterpenes and aliphatics. We assess the volatility of the compounds using the normal boiling point (nBP) as its reverse indicator, and we present the volatility spectra of the blends of the genera studied. Mean nBPs vary among genera, with maximal differences as wide as 118.4 degrees. Finally, we feature basic chemodiversity maps for three aromatic plants, and discuss their importance and prospects as a special case of natural resources maps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available