4.3 Article

Advancing Structural Battery Composites: Robust Manufacturing for Enhanced and Consistent Multifunctional Performance

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aesr.202300109

Keywords

biomimetics; carbon fiber composites; lithium-ion batteries; multifunctional materials; resin-infusion; self-sustaining materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multifunctional materials show potential to improve energy efficiency by creating lighter and more resource-efficient products. Structural battery composites, a type of multifunctional material, offer massless energy storage for electric vehicles and aircraft. This study develops a robust manufacturing procedure to improve the performance and size of structural battery composite cells. The multicell demonstrator showcases the technology's potential for upscaling.
Multifunctional materials offer a possibility to create lighter and more resource-efficient products and thereby improve energy efficiency. Structural battery composites are one type of such a multifunctional material with potential to offer massless energy storage for electric vehicles and aircraft. Although such materials have been demonstrated, their performance level and consistency must be improved. Also, the cell dimensions need to be increased. Herein, a robust manufacturing procedure is developed and structural battery composite cells are repeatedly manufactured with double the multifunctional performance and size compared to state-of-the-art structural battery cells. Furthermore, six structural battery cells are selected and laminated into a structural battery composite multicell demonstrator to showcase the technology. The multicell demonstrator performance is characterized for two different electrical configurations. The low variability in the multifunctional properties of the cells verifies the potential for upscaling offered by the proposed manufacture technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available