3.8 Review

Standard Triple Therapy as a Remedy for Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Journal

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/2772432817666220317152544

Keywords

Helicobacter Pylori eradication; first-line treatment; standard triple therapy; infection therapy; gastrointestinal diseases; lymphoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of standard triple therapy for eradicating H. pylori through systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that standard triple therapy is an effective and safe regimen, although it is not recommended as the first-line therapy for H. pylori infection due to lack of sufficient data. Interestingly, the analysis demonstrated better response to standard triple therapy in Asian populations than in European populations.
Background H. pylori infection, one of the most prevalent infectious diseases, can cause severe health problems. Therefore, it seems to be crucial to effectively counter the H. pylori infection with a well-tolerated eradication regimen. However, since the discovery of H. pylori, the optimal treatment for this disease is still unclear and remains controversial. Objectives The present study aims to estimate the efficacy of standard triple therapy for eradicating H. pylori by systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We identified randomized clinical trials [RCTs] involving triple therapy PPIAC/M [Omeprazole, Amoxicillin, and Clarithromycin/Metronidazole] in the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection and reported eradication rate through electronic and manual searches in PubMed, ISI, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register, and Scopus databases. Data were analyzed using the random effect model, and the Cochrane Q test and I-2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 12. Results Forty-seven RCTs [PPIAC: 40 RCTs and PPIAM: 7 RCTs] with 4,938 patients selected as eligible for the final analysis. Per-protocol eradication rate was 80% [95% CI: 74-84] and 80% [95% CI: 73-87] for PPIAC and PPIAM regimens, respectively. The eradication rate for PPIAC and PPIAM regimens was 83% [95% CI: 70%-95%] and 83% [95% CI: 75%-90%] and also 77% [95% CI: 68%-88%] and 78% [95% CI: 69%-88%], respectively. Based on different treatment durations, the pooled estimates of PP [per-protocol analysis] treatment outcomes were found the highest in 14-day treatment in both regimens. Conclusion Standard triple therapy PPIAC/M is recommended to be an effective and safe regimen, although adequate data are not available to suggest PPIAC/M as the first-line therapy for H. Pylori infection. Interestingly, our analysis demonstrated that PPIAC/M regimens were more effective in Asian than European populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available