3.9 Article

Time-Dependent Prognostic Value of Serological and Measurable Residual Disease Assessments after Idecabtagene Vicleucel

Journal

BLOOD CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 365-373

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-23-0044

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the MRD kinetics in multiple myeloma patients treated with CAR T cells and found that MRD status is a key predictor of progression-free survival. Patients with undetectable MRD at 3 months and beyond had longer PFS if they achieved complete response, while reappearance of normal plasma cells in MRD-negative patients was associated with inferior PFS.
The role of measurable residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells is uncertain. We analyzed MRD kinetics during the first year after idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) infusion in 125 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients enrolled in KarMMa. At month 1 after ide-cel, there were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between patients in less than complete response (CR) versus those in CR; only MRD status was predictive of significantly different PFS at this landmark. In patients with undetectable MRD at 3 months and beyond, PFS was longer in those achieving CR versus 10-6 logarithmic range and reappearance of normal plasma cells in MRD-negative patients were associated with inferior PFS. This study unveils different prognostic implications of serological and MRD response dynamics after ide-cel and suggests the potential value of studying the reappearance of normal plasma cells as a surrogate of loss of CAR T-cell functionality.SIGNIFICANCE: This is one of the first studies evaluating the impact of CR and MRD dynamics after CAR T therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. These data help interpret the prognostic significance of serological and MRD responses at early and late time points after CAR T-cell infusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available