4.6 Review

Mechanisms of mast seeding: resources, weather, cues, and selection

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 212, Issue 3, Pages 546-562

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14114

Keywords

economy of scale; masting behaviour; Moran effect; pollen coupling; pollen limitation; resource budget; resource matching; variable seed production

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB-0816691, DEB-1256394]
  2. Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden grant [UOC1401]
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1256394] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mast seeding is a widespread and widely studied phenomenon. However, the physiological mechanisms that mediate masting events and link them to weather and plant resources are still debated. Here, we explore how masting is affected by plant resource budgets, fruit maturation success, and hormonal coordination of cues including weather and resources. There is little empirical support for the commonly stated hypothesis that plants store carbohydrates over several years to expend in a high-seed year. Plants can switch carbohydrates away from growth in high-seed years, and seed crops are more probably limited by nitrogen or phosphorus. Resources are clearly involved in the proximate mechanisms driving masting, but resource budget (RB) models cannot create masting in the absence of selection because some underlying selective benefit is required to set the level of a full' seed crop at greater than the annual resource increment. Economies of scale (EOSs) provide the ultimate factor selecting for masting, but EOSs probably always interact with resources, which modify the relationship between weather cues and reproduction. Thus, RB and EOS models are not alternative explanations for masting - both are required. Experiments manipulating processes that affect mast seeding will help clarify the physiological mechanisms that underlie mast seeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available