4.6 Article

Optimal bounds for parity-oblivious random access codes

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/4/045003

Keywords

random access codes; device-independence; contextuality violation; non-local games

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency, through CRYQ [ANR-09-JCJC-0067]
  2. European Union through the ERC project QCC
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-JCJC-0067] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Random access coding is an information task that has been extensively studied and found many applications in quantum information. In this scenario, Alice receives an n-bit string x, and wishes to encode x into a quantum state rho(x), such that Bob, when receiving the state rho(x), can choose any bit i is an element of [n] and recover the input bit x(i) with high probability. Here we study two variants: parity-oblivious random access codes (RACs), where we impose the cryptographic property that Bob cannot infer any information about the parity of any subset of bits of the input apart from the single bits xi; and evenparity- oblivious RACs, where Bob cannot infer any information about the parity of any even-size subset of bits of the input. In this paper, we provide the optimal bounds for parity-oblivious quantum RACs and show that they are asymptotically better than the optimal classical ones. Our results provide a large non-contextuality inequality violation and resolve the main open problem in a work of Spekkens et al (2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 010401). Second, we provide the optimal bounds for evenparity- oblivious RACs by proving their equivalence to a non-local game and by providing tight bounds for the success probability of the non-local game via semidefinite programming. In the case of evenparity- oblivious RACs, the cryptographic property holds also in the device independent model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available