3.8 Article

Standard versus short stem cemented Exeter((R)) when used for primary total hip arthroplasty: a survivorship analysis

Journal

ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00200-8

Keywords

Total hip arthroplasty; Cemented; Stem; Length; Short; Outcome; Survival

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to compare the survival rates of cemented standard and short Exeter(R) V40 femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The short stems had similar survival rates to the standard stems at 5- to 10-year follow-up, regardless of the design. The results suggest that the short stems offer comparable outcomes to the standard stems in terms of survival.
Aims The aims were to compare the survival of the cemented standard (150 mm) with the short (DDH [35.5 mm offset or less], number 1 short stem [125 mm options of 37.5 mm, 44 mm, 50 mm offset] and revision [44/00/125]) Exeter (R) V40 femoral stems when used for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).Methods Patients were retrospectively identified from an arthroplasty database. A total of 664 short stem Exeter (R) variants were identified, of which 229 were DDH stems, 208 number 1 stems and 227 revision stems were implanted between 2011 and 2020. A control group of 698 standard Exeter (R) stems used for THA was set up, and were followed up for a minimum of 10 years follow-up (implanted 2011). All-cause survival was assessed for THA and for the stem only. Adjusted analysis was undertaken for age, sex and ASA grade.Results The median survival time for the short stems varied according to design: DDH had a survival time of 6.7 years, number 1 stems 4.1 years, and revision stems 7.2 years. Subjects in the short stem group (n = 664) were significantly younger (mean difference 5.1, P < 0.001) and were more likely to be female (odds ratio 1.89, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.39, P < 0.001), compared to the standard group. There were no differences in THA (P = 0.26) or stem (P = 0.35) survival at 5 years (adjusted THA: 98.3% vs. 97.2%; stem 98.7% vs. 97.8%) or 10 years (adjusted THA 97.0% vs. 96.0 %; stem 96.7% vs. 96.2%) between standard and short stem groups, respectively. At 5 years no differences were found in THA (DDH: 96.7%, number 1 97.5%, revision 97.3%, standard 98.6%) or stem (DDH: 97.6%, number 1 99.0%, revision 97.3%, standard 98.2%) survival between/among the different short stems or when compared to the standard group.Conclusion The Exeter (R) short stems offer equivocal survival when compared to the standard stem at 5- to 10-year follow-up, which does not seem to be influenced by the short stem design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available