4.8 Article

Benefits and Risks of Antiretroviral Therapy for Perinatal HIV Prevention

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 375, Issue 18, Pages 1726-1737

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511691

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH [UM1AI068632, UM1AI068616, UM1AI106716]
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  3. National Institute of Mental Health
  4. Janssen
  5. Gilead Sciences
  6. ViiV Healthcare
  7. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH [UM1AI068632, UM1AI068616, UM1AI106716]
  8. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  9. National Institute of Mental Health
  10. Janssen
  11. Gilead Sciences
  12. ViiV Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Randomized-trial data on the risks and benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ART) as compared with zidovudine and single-dose nevirapine to prevent transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in HIV-infected pregnant women with high CD4 counts are lacking. METHODS We randomly assigned HIV-infected women at 14 or more weeks of gestation with CD4 counts of at least 350 cells per cubic millimeter to zidovudine and single-dose nevirapine plus a 1-to-2-week postpartum tail of tenofovir and emtricitabine (zidovudine alone); zidovudine, lamivudine, and lopinavir-ritonavir (zidovudine-based ART); or tenofovir, emtricitabine, and lopinavir-ritonavir (tenofovir-based ART). The primary outcomes were HIV transmission at 1 week of age in the infant and maternal and infant safety. RESULTS The median CD4 count was 530 cells per cubic millimeter among 3490 primarily black African HIV-infected women enrolled at a median of 26 weeks of gestation (interquartile range, 21 to 30). The rate of transmission was significantly lower with ART than with zidovudine alone (0.5% in the combined ART groups vs. 1.8%; difference, -1.3 percentage points; repeated confidence interval, -2.1 to -0.4). However, the rate of maternal grade 2 to 4 adverse events was significantly higher with zidovudine-based ART than with zidovudine alone (21.1% vs. 17.3%, P = 0.008), and the rate of grade 2 to 4 abnormal blood chemical values was higher with tenofovir-based ART than with zidovudine alone (2.9% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.03). Adverse events did not differ significantly between the ART groups (P > 0.99). A birth weight of less than 2500 g was more frequent with zidovudine-based ART than with zidovudine alone (23.0% vs. 12.0%, P < 0.001) and was more frequent with tenofovir-based ART than with zidovudine alone (16.9% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.004); preterm delivery before 37 weeks was more frequent with zidovudine-based ART than with zidovudine alone (20.5% vs. 13.1%, P < 0.001). Tenofovir-based ART was associated with higher rates than zidovudine-based ART of very preterm delivery before 34 weeks (6.0% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.04) and early infant death (4.4% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.001), but there were no significant differences between tenofovir-based ART and zidovudine alone (P = 0.10 and P = 0.43). The rate of HIV-free survival was highest among infants whose mothers received zidovudine-based ART. CONCLUSIONS Antenatal ART resulted in significantly lower rates of early HIV transmission than zidovudine alone but a higher risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; PROMISE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01061151 and NCT01253538.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available