4.8 Article

Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 375, Issue 19, Pages 1834-1844

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk
  2. Abbott Vascular
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Sanofi Aventis
  7. Merck Sharp Dohme
  8. GenMedica
  9. CeQur
  10. Takeda
  11. GlaxoSmithKline
  12. Janssen
  13. Merck
  14. Aegerion
  15. Amgen
  16. Sanofi
  17. Servier
  18. Pfizer
  19. Medicines Company
  20. GI Dynamics
  21. Intarcia
  22. Medtronic
  23. Mylan Pharmaceuticals
  24. MannKind
  25. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF12OC1015904, NNF16OC0020224, NNF15OC0016230] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Regulatory guidance specifies the need to establish cardiovascular safety of new diabetes therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes in order to rule out excess cardiovascular risk. The cardiovascular effects of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue with an extended half-life of approximately 1 week, in type 2 diabetes are unknown. METHODS We randomly assigned 3297 patients with type 2 diabetes who were on a standard-care regimen to receive once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 mg or 1.0 mg) or placebo for 104 weeks. The primary composite outcome was the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. We hypothesized that semaglutide would be noninferior to placebo for the primary outcome. The non-inferiority margin was 1.8 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio. RESULTS At baseline, 2735 of the patients (83.0%) had established cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or both. The primary outcome occurred in 108 of 1648 patients (6.6%) in the semaglutide group and in 146 of 1649 patients (8.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.95; P<0.001 for non-inferiority). Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 2.9% of the patients receiving semaglutide and in 3.9% of those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P=0.12); nonfatal stroke occurred in 1.6% and 2.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.99; P=0.04). Rates of death from cardiovascular causes were similar in the two groups. Rates of new or worsening nephropathy were lower in the semaglutide group, but rates of retinopathy complications (vitreous hemorrhage, blindness, or conditions requiring treatment with an intravitreal agent or photocoagulation) were significantly higher (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.78; P=0.02). Fewer serious adverse events occurred in the semaglutide group, although more patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes who were at high cardiovascular risk, the rate of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke was significantly lower among patients receiving semaglutide than among those receiving placebo, an outcome that confirmed the noninferiority of semaglutide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available